MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026521614 · doi:10.1002/jnr.22629

Effects of epidermal growth factor and erythropoietin on Müller glial activation and phenotypic plasticity in the adult mammalian retina

2011· article· en· W2026521614 on OpenAlexaff
Philip E. B. Nickerson, Marcus McLeod, Tanya Myers, D. B. Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsDartmouth General HospitalDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinaGlial fibrillary acidic proteinBiologyRetinalCell biologyMuller gliaEpidermal growth factorErythropoietinNestinGliosisGrowth factorNeurogliaProgenitor cellNeural stem cellNeuroscienceStem cellEndocrinologyImmunologyCentral nervous systemCell cultureImmunohistochemistryBiochemistryGeneticsReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retinal Müller glia have received considerable attention with regard to their potential to function as quiescent retinal precursors. Various activation strategies induce characteristic features of retinal progenitor cells in Müller glia; however, these are often accompanied by hallmark features of reactive gliosis. We investigated the effects of an intravitreal injection of epidermal growth factor (EGF), a known mitogen, and erythropoietin (EPO) on activation and expression of developmental phenotypes within the adult retina. Using thymidine-analogue labeling as well as immunocytochemical and confocal analyses, we assayed the responses of retinal cells exposed to intravitreal administration of either EGF or EPO. We report that adult Müller glia incorporate bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and undergo a process of nuclear translocation to ectopic retinal layers following exposure to EGF. These cells survive within the retina for at least 23 days and express the developmental markers Pax6 and Chx10 as well as nestin and glial fibrillary acidic protein. Furthermore, we demonstrate that cotreatment with EGF and EPO suppresses aspects of EGF-induced glial reactivity, alters the retinal distribution of BrdU-positive nuclei, and serves to regulate the expression of developmental phenotypes seen in these cells. These data further our understanding of Müller cell responsiveness to intravitral, combinatorial growth factor treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroscience ResearchSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207