MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026606540 · doi:10.1359/jbmr.040711

Maternal and Fetal Outcome After Long-Term Pamidronate Treatment Before Conception: A Report of Two Cases

2004· article· en· W2026606540 on OpenAlexafffund
Craig F. Munns, Frank Rauch, Leanne M. Ward, Francis H. Glorieux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Mineral Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
FundersShriners Hospitals for ChildrenMcGill University
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticOsteogenesis imperfectaPregnancyPediatricsIn uteroGestationObstetricsSurgeryFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pregnancies of two women with osteogenesis imperfecta who received intravenous pamidronate before conception are reported. The mothers suffered no ill effects. One baby had transient asymptomatic hypocalcemia and one had bilateral talipes equinovarus. This report documents the pregnancy outcomes of two women with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), types I and IV, who received intravenous pamidronate as part of an observational trial before conception. Pamidronate was not administered after conception. Other than hyperemesis in one woman, the pregnancies and deliveries were uneventful. Both babies inherited OI from their mothers. The baby with OI type IV also had bilateral talipes equinovarus. Biochemical evaluation of the mothers and babies at 24 h and/or 2 weeks postpartum was normal, apart from one baby with asymptomatic hypocalcemia at 24 h of age that had resolved when next measured on day 11 of life. No biochemistry was available on the second child until 13 days of age. Neither baby had skeletal modeling abnormalities consistent with in utero pamidronate exposure. The lumbar spine (L1-L4) areal BMD and anterior to posterior height ratios of lumbar vertebral bodies of both women remained constant during pregnancy. Both the mothers and babies remain well and free of fracture 14 and 16 months postpartum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations113
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Mineral ResearchSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207