Marangoni convection. Part 2. A cavity subject to point heating
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marangoni convection in a cavity subject to point (concentrated) heating has been investigated. The analysis includes the complete effects of the interface deformation. The results determined for large Biot and zero Marangoni (zero Prandtl) numbers show that steady convection may exist only for a limited range of Reynolds numbers Re (bounded from above and from below), and for capillary numbers Ca and cavity lengths L smaller than certain critical values. The main factor limiting the existence of steady convection involves the interface approaching the bottom of the cavity. Unsteady analysis shows that when the conditions guaranteeing the existence of steady convection are not met, an interface rupture process sets in leading, eventually, to the formation of a dryout at the bottom of the cavity. The initial stages of the rupture process are characterized by a rapidly accelerating growth of the interface deformation. The critical values of Re , Ca and L , which guarantee the existence of steady convection, are mutually dependent and change with the heating rate; they reach a minimum for instantaneous heating. Too rapid heating produces an oscillatory transient which always decays in the range of parameters studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".