MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026667442 · doi:10.1021/ja040101n

Hydration of Phenylketene Revisited:  A Counter-Intuitive Result

2004· article· en· W2026667442 on OpenAlexaff
Yvonne Chiang, Andrei V. Fedorov, A. J. Kresge, Ikenna Onyido, Thomas T. Tidwell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbsorbanceChemistryFlash photolysisAqueous solutionEnolKineticsReaction rate constantPhenylacetic acidCatalysisKeteneAqueous mediumPhotochemistryComputational chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In previous work (Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 1719-1723 and J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9165-9171), flash photolysis of diazoacetophenone or phenylhydroxycyclopropenone in aqueous solution was found to produce phenylketene as a short-lived transient species with absorbance at lambda congruent with 260 nm, which decayed with single-exponential kinetics. It has now been discovered that, in the acidity region [H(+)] = 0.000 01 to 0.06 M, this decay is preceded by a faster absorbance rise, and that the overall change conforms well to a double exponential rate law. Analysis of the new data produces rate profiles whose general shapes, as well as the numerical values of their constituent rate constants, plus the form of buffer catalysis, indicate that this newly discovered absorbance rise represents ketonization of phenylacetic acid enol, and that the subsequent absorbance decay represents addition of water to phenylketene. The chemistry of the system, however, requires ketene hydration to precede enol ketonization in a time sequence opposite from that of the absorbance changes. This seemingly counter-intuitive result is nevertheless consistent with the rate law that governs the time evolution of the central species in a two-step rise and decay, such as that observed here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicChemical Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207