MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026670635 · doi:10.1002/jcb.21365

Acetylation of histone H4 in complex structural transitions of spermiogenic chromatin

2007· article· en· W2026670635 on OpenAlexaff
Kathryn Kurtz, Fina Martínez‐Soler, Juan Ausió, Manel Chiva

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Biochemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromatinHistone H4ProtamineHistoneAcetylationSpermiogenesisCell biologySpermatidLysineChemistryBiophysicsNucleusBiologyBiochemistrySpermGeneticsDNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In spermiogenic nuclei of the cephalopod mollusc Sepia officinalis histones are replaced by a precursor-protamine molecule, which is later converted into protamine. Simultaneously, spermiogenic chromatin undergoes a complex structural change. Somatic-like chromatin belonging to the earliest spermatid is progressively reorganized into: (a) granules of 20 nm diameter, (b) fibres of 30-35 nm, and (c) fibres of 40-50 nm. In the final phases of spermiogenesis these fibres of 40-50 nm join to form larger structures of condensed chromatin, and lastly, the uniformly packed chromatin in the sperm nucleus. Using specific antibodies for mono- and hyperacetylated forms of histone H4, in this work we show that the first structural remodelling of chromatin (from somatic-like organization into 20 nm granules) is given concomitantly with a massive mono-acetylation of H4 (acetylation in lysine 12), whereas the structural remodelling from 30-35 to 40-50 nm fibres is produced simultaneously with hyperacetylation of H4 and the nuclear removal of histones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular BiochemistrySame topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchFrench-language works237,207