MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026720232 · doi:10.1080/11926422.2008.9673471

A new chapter?

2008· article· en· W2026720232 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jean Daudelin, Laura Dawson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Foreign Policy Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrime ministerLatin AmericansPolitical scienceNegotiationGovernment (linguistics)Foreign policyLawEconomic historyPublic administrationPoliticsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the spring of 2007, Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced that Canada would reengage with Latin America. Led by Assistant-Deputy Minister Alex Bugailiskis, one of Foreign Affairs’ most experienced Latin America hands, a small team was charged with developing a new strategy for the Americas. Eighteen months later, no document has yet been released, but a free trade agreement has been signed with Peru, a second one is in the offing with Colombia, and negotiations are underway with the Caribbean. Notable is Prime Minister Harper’s July 2007 trip to Latin America, where he visited old partners, like the Caribbean and Chile, and, a first for a Canadian prime minister, stopped in Colombia, where he delivered a strong message of support to embattled president Fernando Uribe. As Deputy Minister Leonard Edwards puts it in the preface to this issue, the government intends to engage in a “focused and sustained” effort, seeking a real and lasting impact on the region. Is some kind of new age dawning – again – for Canada’s relations with Latin America? The collection of articles in this special issue of Canadian Foreign Policy is meant to provide some background to this flurry of activity. This special issue emerged from a conference, Canada and the Americas: Defining Re-engagment, held in March 2008 in Ottawa, which brought together a large group of experts, union and NGO representatives, business people, public officials, and members of the diplomatic community to discuss the new initiative. The sessions were lively, even as their tone was often skeptical, given the sorry fate of previous iterations of such “re-engagements” with the Americas. There was also criticism from some quarters, especially over the heavy focus on trade agreements and this new enthusiasm for a Colombia that is still very much at war. Nevertheless, participants were both sympathetic to and supportive of the government’s willingness to seriously engage the Americas beyond its traditional focus on the United States. Before introducing the articles themselves, we would like to briefly outline some of the main challenges and opportunities that a Canadian re-engagement is likely to meet. The first is the quick pace of change in the region and in the world. Over the last few months, the political dynamics in Venezuela have grown more tense, violent confrontations have left bodies in the streets of Bolivia, and Argentina’s economic and political situation has deteriorated to the point where investment is pouring out of the country. Latin America’s recent bout of prosperity has been driven by record-high commodity prices and inflows of foreign investment, both of which are now under threat as the US financial crisis threatens to engulf the world – scaring investors and driving down the price of commodities, beginning with oil. The reaction to those events, in Latin America and in the United States, may be just as significant. Led by Brazil and Chile, South American countries have taken the lead in trying to calm things down in Bolivia, highlighting a growing suspicion towards extra-regional “interventions” (see Max Cameron and Catherine Hecht, infra). In the United States, the 5

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.815

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.004
Scholarly communication0.0150.010
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2440.089

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Foreign Policy JournalSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207