Design and evaluation of an external high‐current target for production of <sup>211</sup>At
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report presents the design and testing of an external target system for clinical‐scale production of 211 At on the Scanditronix MC‐50 cyclotron at the University of Washington Medical Center. While other 211 At production sites have typically employed an internal target, an external target setup was deemed necessary at our facility since the cyclotron's main application is for cancer patient treatment via fast neutron therapy. The challenge was that previous external 211 At targets demonstrated reduced yields when compared to internal target systems. The target developed in this study has been used in more than 100 irradiations. From those irradiations 211 At saturated yields of 181 ± 16 MBq/μA and 241 ± 17 MBq/μA at 28.0 and 29.0 MeV, respectively, were obtained. Importantly, consistent yields were observed over the 25–60 μA range of irradiation currents evaluated. With a recent production in excess of 4 GBq 211 At for a 29.0 MeV, 58 μA, 4‐hour irradiation, this external target system has demonstrated its potential for producing clinically relevant quantities of 211 At.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".