MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026792230

The Unintended Consequences of Low H-1B Visa Caps: Brain Blocking, Brain Diversion, and Racial Discrimination Against Asian Technology Professionals

2010· article· en· W2026792230 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeffrey L Gower

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnintended consequencesImmigrationBrain drainSpillover effectBusinessChinaFace (sociological concept)Political scienceDemographic economicsInternational tradeEconomicsSociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

American business interests face increasing difficulties as they attempt to compete against global technology-based industries. As the U.S. educational system produces interests face increasing difficulties as they attempt to compete fewer technology workers, many firms look to foreign countries such as India, China, or other Asian countries that have an abundance of skilled professionals. The U.S. Congress created the H-1B visa program in 1990 for educated skilled foreign workers, and manipulated the yearly cap on several occasions. Limits were as high as 195,000 as recently as 2003, but were reduced to 65,000 by 2009. The result of placing a low cap on available H-1B visas places a hardship both on domestic high-technology businesses, which cannot get sufficient quantities of desired workers to fill employment slots, but to the U.S. as well with reduced opportunities to recruit potential educated citizens. An unintended consequence of fewer H-1B visas produces a reduction of overall potential national brain gain optimization that could result from the spillover and agglomeration effects from the exchange of ideas in the marketplace (an effect that I refer to as brain blocking). Further, the brain gain that could have been accrued to the U.S. has been re-routed, either to immigration-friendly countries such as Canada or remains in the Asian professional’s home country if the worker decided to stay there (an effect that I refer to as brain diversion). Further, the imposition of a low H-1B visa cap appears to have similarities to historical race-based immigration restrictions that kept Chinese and other Asian workers out of the domestic workforce in earlier centuries. This paper looks at the development of H-1B visa public policy, the historical record of legislation to restrict Asian immigrant labor into the U.S., and the unintended consequences that result from low caps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207