Metastases to level IIb in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, a meta-analysis of level IIb metastases in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity was conducted. METHODS: Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full text papers deemed potentially relevant. Data were pooled using a random intercept model. RESULTS: In this analysis, 729 abstracts and 177 full text papers were screened (Kappa statistic 0.8 and 1.0, respectively). A total of 332 patients in 9 papers were included in the analysis. Twenty patients had level IIb metastases (mean, 6%; range, 0% to 10.4%). The pooled percentage of level IIb metastases was 6.0% (95% CI: 3.5-8.6). Only 3 patients with level IIb metastases had isolated nodal disease. Eighty-five percent of those with level IIb metastases had additional nodal disease (95% CI: 64.0-94.8), with IIa being a common denominator among all. CONCLUSION: Level IIb nodal metastases are relatively uncommon in previously untreated SCC of the oral cavity (6%). Furthermore, isolated level IIb nodal disease is uncommon. However, given the quality of evidence to date, it is recommended that dissection of level IIb remain the standard of care in oral cavity squamous cell cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".