LA DIVERSITÉ CULTURELLE, LA LIBERTÉ RELIGIEUSE ET LE DROIT DES FEMMES À L’ÉGALITÉ : TENSIONS À L’HORIZON - DOI: 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2013vJJp169
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Québec, à la suite d’une immigration récente plus diversifiée, la question de la liberté religieuse et de la diversité culturelle s’est posée avec beaucoup d’acuité. Des groupes religieux minoritaires ont demandé des traitements spéciaux aux autorités étatiques, demandes qui portaient atteinte, dans certains cas, à d’autres droits fondamentaux. Pour la société québécoise qui s’est progressivement laïcisée depuis les années 1960 et qui s’est éloignée de la pratique religieuse catholique, ces multiples demandes à caractère religieux ont alors été difficiles à comprendre. Interpellé par la population québécoise sur ces questions, le gouvernement est intervenu de différentes façons dans le débat sur le respect de la diversité religieuse.L’objectif de la réflexion vise à aborder les tensions entre la diversité culturelle, la liberté de religion et le droit des femmes à l’égalité. Je prendrai l’exemple du Québec. Comment concilier l’intérêt public et les intérêts des femmes ? Le droit à l’égalité pour les femmes peut-il être relégué à un second plan au nom du respect de la diversité culturelle et du droit à la liberté de religion ? Comment décliner le droit des femmes à l’égalité en tenant compte des valeurs culturelles des femmes ? Ce débat soulève des questions au sujet du relativisme culturel, de la protection de droits fondamentaux sur le plan international, des différences, d’ethnocentrisme et d’impérialisme occidental. Mots-clés : Femme.Droit à l’égalité. Liberté religieuse. Liberté culturelleAbstract In Québec, following a recent more diversified immigration, the question of religious freedom and cultural diversity was put to the forefront. Religious minority groups asked the State for special treatments, which in some cases violated other groups’ fundamental rights. The Quebec society, who has put aside religious practices since the ‘60s and has opted for a more secular state, had problems understanding these religious demands. The Quebec government intervened in different ways in the debate on religious diversity.My paper will deal with tensions between cultural diversity, religious freedom and women’s right to equality. Québec will serve as my example. How can we reconcile public interest and women’s interests? Can women’s right to equality be put aside in order to respect cultural diversity and religious freedom ? How can we imagine women’s right to equality while taking into account their cultural diversity? This raises questions on cultural relativism, on the protection of fundamental rights, on differences, ethnocentrism and cultural imperialism.Keywords : Woman. Right to equality. Religious freedom. Cultural diversity
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".