MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026844949 · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2014)107

QCD in magnetic field, Landau levels and double-life of unbroken center-symmetry

2014· article· en· W2026844949 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed M. Anber, Mithat Ünsal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of High Energy Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsDeconfinementQuantum chromodynamicsLandau quantizationGauge theoryFermionQuantum electrodynamicsQuantum mechanicsMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the thermal confinement/deconfinement and non-thermal quantum phase transitions or rapid cross-overs in QCD and QCD-like theories in external magnetic fields. At large magnetic fields, while the contribution of gauge fluctuations to Wilson-line potential remains unaltered at one-loop order, the contribution of fermions effectively becomes two lower dimensional and is enhanced by the density of states of the lowest Landau level (LLL). In a spatial compactification and for heavy adjoint fermions, this enhancement leads to a calculable zero temperature quantum phase transition on $$ {\mathbb{R}}^3\times {\mathbb{S}}^1 $$ driven by a competition between the center-destabilizing gauge contribution and center-stabilizing LLL fermions. We also show that at a (formal) asymptotically large magnetic field, the adjoint fermions with arbitrarily large but fixed mass stabilize the center symmetry. This is an exotic case of simultaneous non-decoupling of large mass fermions (due to the enhancement by the LLL density of states) and decoupling from the low energy effective field theory. This observation has important implications for both Hosotani mechanism, for which gauge symmetry “breaking” occurs, and large-N volume independence (Eguchi-Kawai reduction), for which gauge structure is never “broken”. Despite sounding almost self-contradictory, we carefully explain the physical scales entering the problem, double-meaning of unbroken center symmetry and how a clash is avoided. We also identify, for both thermal and spatial compactification, the jump in magnetic susceptibility as an order parameter for the deconfinement transition. The predictions of our analysis are testable by using current lattice techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of High Energy PhysicsSame topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207