MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026862732 · doi:10.1017/s1743921311020448

The science of EChO

2010· article· en· W2026862732 on OpenAlexaff
G. Tinetti, James Y‐K. Cho, C. A. Griffith, Olivier Grasset, Lee Grenfell, T. Guillot, Tommi Koskinen, Julianne I. Moses, David Pinfield, Jonathan Tennyson, Marcell Tessenyi, Robin Wordsworth, A. D. Aylward, R. van Boekel, A. Coradini, Thérèse Encrenaz, I. A. G. Snellen, M. R. Zapatero Osorio, J. Bouwman, Vincent Coudé du Foresto, Mercedes López-Morales, Ingo Mueller‐Wodarg, Ε. Πάλλη, Franck Selsis, A. Sozzetti, Jean‐Philippe Beaulieu, Thomas Henning, Michael Meyer, G. Micela, I. Ribas, Daphne Stam, Mark G. Swain, O. Krause, Marc Ollivier, E. Pace, B. Swinyard, P. A. R. Ade, A. Adriani, C. B. Agnor, C. Afonso, Carlos Prieto, G. Á. Bakos, R. J. Barber, M. J. Barlow, P. F. Bernath, Bruno Bézard, P. Bordé, Linda R. Brown, A. Cassan, C. Cavarroc, A. Ciaravella, Charles Cockell, A. Coustenis, Camilla Danielski, L. Decin, Remco de Kok, O. D. S. Demangeon, Pieter Deroo, P. Doel, P. Drossart, Leigh N. Fletcher, François Forget, Steve Fossey, P. Fouqué, James Frith, M. Galand, P. Gaulme, J. I. Gónzalez Hernández, D. Grassi, M. J. Griffin, U. Grözinger, M. Guêdel, P. Guio, O. Hainaut, Robert J. Hargreaves, Peter H. Hauschildt, Kevin Heng, David Heyrovský, R. Hueso, P. G. J. Irwin, Lisa Kaltenegger, David Kipping, G. Kovács, A. La Barbera, Helmut Lammer, E. Lellouch, G. Leto, Mercedes Morales, M. Á. López‐Valverde, M. López‐Puertas, Christophe Lovi, A. Maggio, J. P. Maillard, Jesús Maldonado Prado, J. B. Marquette, Pierre Maxted, S. Miller, S. Molinari, D. Montes, Amaya Moro‐Martín, O. Mousis, Napoléon Nguyen Tuong, Richard P. Nelson, Glenn S. Orton, E. Pantin, E. Pascale, E. Poretti, Raman K. Prinja, L. Prisinzano, Jean-Michel Réess, A. Reiners, Benjamin Samuel, Dimitar Sasselov, G. Savini, B. Sicardy, Lars Stixrude, G. Strazzulla, Gautam Vasisht, Sandrine Vinatier, S. Viti, I. Waldmann, G. J. White, Thomas Widemann, R. V. Yelle, Yuk L. Yung, S. N. Yurchenko

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Astronomical Union · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsPlanetExoplanetAstrobiologyTransit (satellite)Kepler-47AstronomyTerrestrial planetPhysicsSolar SystemCircumstellar habitable zoneStarsPlanetary migration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The science of extra-solar planets is one of the most rapidly changing areas of astrophysics and since 1995 the number of planets known has increased by almost two orders of magnitude. A combination of ground-based surveys and dedicated space missions has resulted in 560-plus planets being detected, and over 1200 that await confirmation. NASA's Kepler mission has opened up the possibility of discovering Earth-like planets in the habitable zone around some of the 100,000 stars it is surveying during its 3 to 4-year lifetime. The new ESA's Gaia mission is expected to discover thousands of new planets around stars within 200 parsecs of the Sun. The key challenge now is moving on from discovery, important though that remains, to characterisation: what are these planets actually like, and why are they as they are? In the past ten years, we have learned how to obtain the first spectra of exoplanets using transit transmission and emission spectroscopy. With the high stability of Spitzer, Hubble, and large ground-based telescopes the spectra of bright close-in massive planets can be obtained and species like water vapour, methane, carbon monoxide and dioxide have been detected. With transit science came the first tangible remote sensing of these planetary bodies and so one can start to extrapolate from what has been learnt from Solar System probes to what one might plan to learn about their faraway siblings. As we learn more about the atmospheres, surfaces and near-surfaces of these remote bodies, we will begin to build up a clearer picture of their construction, history and suitability for life. The Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory, EChO, will be the first dedicated mission to investigate the physics and chemistry of Exoplanetary Atmospheres. By characterising spectroscopically more bodies in different environments we will take detailed planetology out of the Solar System and into the Galaxy as a whole. EChO has now been selected by the European Space Agency to be assessed as one of four M3 mission candidates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Astronomical UnionSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207