"Au temps et dans les quantités qui lui plaisent": Poachers, Outlaws, and Rural Banditry in Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La question de la conservation de la faune dans le Québec de la seconde moitié du XIX e siècle a provoqué des confrontations. L'exemplifie le cas d'Henri Ladouceur, un braconnier de la région de la Beauce des Cantons de l'Est, au Québec, qui devint un personnage notoire sur la scène provinciale durant une chasse à l'homme de deux ans qui déboucha sur son emprisonnement en décembre 1897. L'étude utilise des documents officiels, des dossiers d'associations, des reportages de journaux et des comparaisons avec le « hors-la-loi du Mégantic » des années 1880 pour dépeindre le braconnage comme une expression du banditisme social et environnemental et pour examiner diverses allégations voulant que l'homme jouisse du droit fondé sur la classe, l'appartenance ethnique, le genre et le territoire de chasser. Outre ses implications pour la conservation de la faune, la réglementation des ressources et l'ordre social, le cas Ladouceur a laissé son empreinte dans le récit plus vaste de la résistance rurale à la loi, à l'État et aux formes privées du pouvoir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".