MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026918197 · doi:10.1002/dvdy.21685

Integrin‐linked kinase regulates E‐cadherin expression through PARP‐1

2008· article· en· W2026918197 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Dynamics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchTerry Fox Foundation
KeywordsBiologyGene silencingIntegrin-linked kinaseTranscription factorSnailCell biologyMolecular biologyPoly ADP ribose polymeraseCancer researchKinaseProtein kinase APolymeraseGeneticsGeneCyclin-dependent kinase 2

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Repression of E-cadherin expression by the transcription factor, Snail, is implicated in epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cancer progression. We show here that Integrin-Linked Kinase (ILK) regulates E-cadherin expression through Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1). ILK overexpression in Scp2 cells resulted in stimulation of Snail expression and loss of E-cadherin expression. Silencing of ILK, Akt or Snail resulted in re-expression of E-cadherin in PC3 cells. To elucidate the signaling pathway downstream of ILK, we identified candidate Snail promoter ILK Responsive Element (SIRE) binding proteins. PARP-1 was identified as a SIRE-binding protein. ILK silencing inhibited binding of PARP-1 to SIRE. PARP-1 silencing resulted in inhibition of Snail and ZEB1, leading to up-regulation of E-cadherin. We suggest a model in which ILK represses E-cadherin expression by regulating PARP-1, leading to the binding of PARP-1 to SIRE and modulation of Snail expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it