Host phytochemicals in regulation of nutritional ecology and population dynamics of <i>Podontia quatuordecimpunctata</i> L. (Colioptera :Chrysomelidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Determination ofhost preference depends on chemical cues including nutritional requirements is a cornerstone in insect pest ecology and their control. Their nutritional ecology and demographic parameters are co-related with the variation of host phytochemical regime. Here, the host preference in relation to feeding dynamics and life table parameters of Podontia quatuordecimpunctata L. were studied under laboratory conditions. The feeding indices and population parameters of P. quatuordecimpunctata were significantly higher ( P < 0.05) on Spondias pinnata relative to S. dulcis (Anacardiaceae) due to the variation in their phytochemical regime of the respective host plants. The pest on S. pinnata has shorter mean generation time (T c ) of 143.333±0.265 days with higher net reproductive rate (R 0 ) of 31.160±2.553 . Their generation survival (GS) on S. pinnata (0.663) is significantly higher than S. dulcis (0.513) with reverse of total generation mortality (K). Thus, the pestshowed more feeding preference and higher reproductive growth to its host plant, S. pinnata than S. dulcis . This research supports the previous studies on insect nutrition in relation to their host phytochemicals and support to find the most vulnerable stage of this pest for appropriate control measures. It also provides the importance of S. pinnata as a trapping plant to avoid or minimum invasion of this pest towards S. dulcis for their better yields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".