MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027058567 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2003-028-5

A Note on Cyclotomic Euler Systems and the Double Complex Method

2003· article· en· W2027058567 on OpenAlexaff
Greg W. Anderson, Yi Ouyang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSquare-free integerAbelian groupRecursion (computer science)Integer (computer science)CohomologyPrime numberGroup (periodic table)Prime (order theory)DiagonalOrder (exchange)Pure mathematicsModuloEuler's formulaClass (philosophy)CombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let be a finite real abelian extension of ℚ. Let M be an odd positive integer. For every squarefree positive integer r the prime factors of which are congruent to 1 modulo M and split completely in , the corresponding Kolyvagin class satisfies a remarkable and crucial recursion which for each prime number ℓ dividing r determines the order of vanishing of κ r at each place of above ℓ in terms of κ r/ℓ . In this note we give the recursion a new and universal interpretation with the help of the double complex method introduced by Anderson and further developed by Das and Ouyang. Namely, we show that the recursion satis_ed by Kolyvagin classes is the specialization of a universal recursion independent of satisfied by universal Kolyvagin classes in the group cohomology of the universal ordinary distribution à la Kubert tensored with ℤ= M ℤ. Further, we show by a method involving a variant of the diagonal shift operation introduced by Das that certain group cohomology classes belonging (up to sign) to a basis previously constructed by Ouyang also satisfy the universal recursion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MathematicsSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207