MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027058567 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2003-028-5

A Note on Cyclotomic Euler Systems and the Double Complex Method

2003· article· en· W2027058567 on OpenAlexaff
Greg W. Anderson, Yi Ouyang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSquare-free integerAbelian groupRecursion (computer science)Integer (computer science)CohomologyPrime numberGroup (periodic table)Prime (order theory)DiagonalOrder (exchange)Pure mathematicsModuloEuler's formulaClass (philosophy)CombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let be a finite real abelian extension of ℚ. LetMbe an odd positive integer. For every squarefree positive integerrthe prime factors of which are congruent to 1 moduloMand split completely in , the corresponding Kolyvagin class satisfies a remarkable and crucial recursion which for each prime number ℓ dividingrdetermines the order of vanishing of κrat each place of above ℓ in terms of κr/ℓ. In this note we give the recursion a new and universal interpretation with the help of the double complex method introduced by Anderson and further developed by Das and Ouyang. Namely, we show that the recursion satis_ed by Kolyvagin classes is the specialization of a universal recursion independent of satisfied by universal Kolyvagin classes in the group cohomology of the universal ordinary distributionà laKubert tensored with ℤ=Mℤ. Further, we show by a method involving a variant of the diagonal shift operation introduced by Das that certain group cohomology classes belonging (up to sign) to a basis previously constructed by Ouyang also satisfy the universal recursion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MathematicsSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207