Substrate Temperature Effect on the Structural and Optical Properties of Znse Thin Films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zinc selenide (ZnSe) thin films were deposited on to chemically and ultrasonically cleaned glass substrates at different substrate temperatures from room temperature to 200°C keeping the thickness fixed at 300 nm by using thermal evaporation method in vacuum. The structural properties of the films were ascertained by X-ray diffraction (XRD) method utilizing a diffractometer. The optical properties were measured in the photon wavelength ranging between 300 and 2500 nm by using a UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer. The XRD patterns reveal that the films were polycrystalline in nature exhibiting f.c.c zincblende structure with average lattice parameter, a = 5.6873Å. The grain size, strain and dislocation densities of the films have bee calculated. The optical transmittance and reflectance were utilized to compute the absorption coefficient, band gap energy and refractive index of the films. The band gap energy of the films was extracted from the absorption spectra. The direct band gap energy of the films slightly increases with substrate temperature.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbas.v36i2.12969Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, Vol. 36, No. 2, 233-240, 2012
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".