A single center experience with the newly designed R Stent in small coronary vessels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the past 10 years stents have been used more frequently for the treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis. Initally these devices were used primarily in coronary arteries with diameters ranging from 3.0 to 4.0 mm. Traditionally, coronary arteries less than 3.0 mm in diameter were treated with only balloon angioplasty, due to the unavailablity of flexible, low profile, small diameter stents. In the past three years, many stents have been designed to be implanted in small coronary arteries. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasiblity of the R Stent in patients with coronary lesions located in coronary arteries with a reference diameter 2.5-3.0 mm. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between November 1998 and September 1999, 32 patients with stable (37%) and unstable (63%) angina treated with the R Stent were included in this study. The treated lesions were in the right coronary artery (RCA) (n = 13), left cirumflex coronary artery (LCX) (n = 10), and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (n = 9). Of these lesions thirteen were anatomically complex. Stent deployment was successful in 97% with one crossing failure in a patient with a vessel tortuosity of greater than 75 degrees of the circumflex artery. No post-procedual major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) occurred within 30 days of stent implantation. After the procedure, patients were scheduled for a two-week telephone follow-up and a one-month clinical evaluation. At 30 days, only one patient (3%) experienced the recurrence of angina Canadian cardiovascular society classification ((CCS) Class 2). All other patients were event and angina free. CONCLUSION: This first clinical experience in patients with small vessel disease shows that the use of the R stent is safe and feasible with low rates of acute stent thrombosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".