Spatial distribution of some microbial trophic groups in a plug-flow-type anaerobic bioreactor treating swine manure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anaerobic digestion of swine manure is carried out by a consortium of microbial species, including volatile fatty acid (VFA) producers, VFA-degraders and methanogens. The distribution of five phylogenetic groups within a plug-flow-type anaerobic bioreactor consisting of eight serially-connected tanks was examined through the sequential digestion of swine manure. Quantification was carried out using reverse transcription real-time PCR (RT-Q-PCR) assays targeting the 16S rRNA of Clostridium (cluster XIVa), Peptostreptococcus, Syntrophomonas, Methanosaeta, and Methanosarcina spp. The VFA producers Peptostreptococcus spp. and Clostridium spp. were found predominantly in compartments where hydrolysis/acidogenesis took place. The spatial distribution of the aceticlastic methanogens, Methanosaeta and Methanosarcina, within the bioreactor was not correlated with methanogenic activity. In contrast the VFA-degrading genus Syntrophomonas spp. was more abundant in compartments with elevated methanogenic activity. Multivariate statistical analyses of the RT-Q-PCR data have provided new insights into our understanding of how the various trophic groups were distributed within this bioreactor system. While the distribution of clostridia, peptostreptococci and Syntrophomonas corresponded to their known metabolic functions, aceticlastic methanogens were not apparently linked to the methanogenesis stage occurring in latter compartments, suggesting that hydrogenotrophic methanogens were the primary methane generators in this bioreactor. However, aceticlastic methanogens could be involved in compartments related to the hydrolysis/acidogenesis stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".