Comparison of the Bactericidal Action of Amikacin, Netilmicin and Tobramycin in Free and Liposomal Formulation against Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rates at which free, cationic and anionic liposomal forms of amikacin, netilmicin and tobramycin kill Pseudomonas aeruginosa were studied in vitro. Control inocula with no antibiotic yielded 6.76, 9.53 and 9.74 log CFU/ml at 0, 6 and 24 h, respectively. Empty anionic or cationic liposomes had no effect on bacterial growth. The killing rates of free antibiotics against the bacterial strain were not enhanced by the addition of either empty anionic or cationic liposomes. After 6 and 24 h of exposure at 1, 2 and 4 times the minimum inhibitory concentrations, free amikacin, netilmicin and tobramycin demonstrated a more rapid bactericidal effect than encapsulated anionic or cationic liposomes. The killing rates of liposomal aminoglycosides were lower than those of free aminoglycosides at identical concentrations, suggesting that only fractions of the encapsulated drugs were released from liposomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it