MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027357377 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggt019

Seismic waveform tomography across the Seattle Fault Zone in Puget Sound: resolution analysis and effectiveness of visco-acoustic inversion of viscoelastic data

2013· article· en· W2027357377 on OpenAlexaff
Eric M. Takam Takougang, Andrew J. Calvert

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyAttenuationSeismologyViscoelasticityTomographyWaveformInversion (geology)Seismic tomographyAcousticsAcoustic attenuationGeophysicsRadarOpticsMaterials scienceMantle (geology)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visco-acoustic waveform tomography was applied to marine seismic reflection data across the Seattle fault zone in Puget Sound in the northwestern USA. Using the recovered velocity and attenuation models, we performed a set of synthetic visco-acoustic and viscoelastic checkerboard tests, and compared the results to verify the effectiveness of applying visco-acoustic waveform tomography to viscoelastic field data. Visco-acoustic waveform tomography produces higher resolution velocity and attenuation models than ray-based tomography, but artefacts due to elastic effects such as mode conversion are present at layer interfaces where the velocity contrast is high. Elastic effects also affect attenuation values, which can be too high or too low in places because visco-acoustic inversion compensates the loss of amplitude due to mode conversion by inadequately estimating the attenuation. A comparison of the attenuation models inverted from viscoelastic and visco-acoustic synthetic data suggests that inverted attenuation values can be reliable when the velocity gradient is low, and the quality of the inversion improves in a highly attenuating medium or in a medium with high attenuation contrasts. Joint interpretation of the derived velocity and attenuation models enables us to identify Quaternary (glacial and postglacial Pleistocene) sedimentary, Tertiary sedimentary and Eocene volcanic rocks. Several shallow faults, anticlines and a syncline are identified across the Seattle uplift and the Seattle fault zone. Our interpretation of faults using the velocity model, attenuation model and migrated seismic section is consistent with two possible published models of the Seattle Fault Zone: either a thrust fault that accommodates north–south shortening by forming a fault-propagation fold with a forelimb breakthrough, or part of a passive roof duplex in which the Seattle Fault Zone is located at the leading edge of a triangle zone that is propagating into the Seattle basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207