MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027362083 · doi:10.1149/1.2801987

Electrocatalytic Activity of Nanoporous Pt–Ir Materials toward Methanol Oxidation and Oxygen Reduction

2007· article· en· W2027362083 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Holt-Hindle, Qingfeng Yi, Guosheng Wu, Kallum M. Koczkur, Aicheng Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanoporousBimetallic stripElectrochemistryElectrodeMaterials scienceElectrocatalystInorganic chemistryMethanolChemical engineeringChemistryNanotechnologyMetalOrganic chemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanoporous bimetallic electrocatalysts with different contents of iridium (Ir%: 15, 28, 40, and 50) were prepared using a one-step facile hydrothermal method. Formaldehyde was used as the reduction agent to simultaneously reduce and , resulting in the formation of bimetallic nanoporous structures. Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were employed to characterize the surface morphology and composition of the as-synthesized samples. A number of electrochemical methods were used to study the electrochemical activity of the different nanoporous electrodes toward methanol oxidation and oxygen reduction. Our electrochemical studies show that the synthesized nanoporous electrodes possess extraordinarily high electroactive surface areas and that the presence of Ir significantly improves the electrocatalytic activity of Pt toward the electrochemical oxidation of methanol and the electrochemical reduction of oxygen. Of the synthesized nanoporous electrodes, the electrode exhibits the highest electrocatalytic activity. The steady-state current density of the nanoporous electrode for methanol oxidation at is 345 times higher than that of a polycrystalline Pt electrode and over four times higher than that of a nanoporous Pt electrode

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207