A Cross-Sectional Study Examining the Functional Independence of Elderly Individuals With a Functioning Kidney Transplant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies of patients dependent on dialysis show that they have a high need for help with routine daily activities. In many cases, individuals who undergo kidney transplantation have previously been treated with dialysis for a significant period of time, thus many of the characteristics may be similar. The purpose of this study was to estimate the rate of functional disability in a cross-sectional population of older patients with a functioning kidney transplant. METHODS: Kidney transplant patients, aged 65 years or more, were approached to participate. Patients were interviewed to ascertain current living situation, employment status, and 1-year fall history. Functional assessments included the Barthel Index, the Lawton-Brody Scale, the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and dynamometer handgrip strength. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (71%) agreed to participate. Over half (54%) reported being disabled or requiring assistance for at least one daily-living activity, with housekeeping, grocery shopping, and laundry being the activities most commonly affected. Most patients had markedly impaired TUG and handgrip tests, and 21% recalled having fallen more than once in the past year. LIMITATIONS: We used a single-center, cross-sectional study design. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate a high prevalence of functional dependence, unintentional falls, and significant morbidity associated with decreased muscle strength in the older kidney transplant population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".