Ozone and NO<sub>2</sub> variations measured during the 1 August 2008 solar eclipse above Eureka, Canada with a UV‐visible spectrometer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On 1 August 2008, a solar eclipse of 98% totality passed over the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory at Eureka, Canada (80.05°N, 86.42°W), which is run by the Canadian Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Change. During the eclipse, a zenith‐sky UV‐visible spectrometer measured slant column densities (SCDs) and vertical column densities (VCDs) of ozone up to 82% occultation and NO2 up to 96% occultation, beyond which low light intensities and changes in the solar spectrum due to limb darkening compromised data quality. Ozone VCDs during the eclipse remained within natural variability, and this study is inconclusive regarding ozone oscillations due to limited temporal resolution and measurement errors toward eclipse maximum. Measured NO2 SCDs increased and decreased symmetrically around the eclipse maximum. NO2 SCDs were also calculated using a photochemical box model and a one‐dimensional radiative transfer model. The modeled ratio of eclipse day SCDs to the previous day's SCDs was compared to the measurements. They agreed within error bars leading up to maximum occultation, but the model ratio was systematically larger than the measured ratio for the second half of the eclipse, perhaps due to changing cloud conditions throughout the eclipse. The measured NO2 SCD ratio of 1.84−0.43+0.12 at 96% totality is larger than observed in past studies and agrees with modeled ratio of 1.91. Therefore our current understanding of stratospheric photochemistry is sufficient to predict the evolution of NOx chemistry through a solar eclipse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".