Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-1 and Neonatal Compensatory Lung Growth after Exposure to 95% Oxygen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neonatal rats exposed to 95% oxygen (O2) for 7 days from birth had inhibited lung growth, DNA synthesis, and secondary septation. These parameters were rapidly restored by a period of recovery in air. Northern and Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry were used to screen for the fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 (FGF-R1) and its high affinity ligand, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), which could have a role in this recovery process. Expression of bFGF in the lung was significantly reduced at the end of the 7-day exposure to 95% O2 and was increased after 3 days of recovery in air. Expression of FGF-R1 was not affected by exposure to 95% O2 or recovery in air. We hypothesized that the increase in bFGF after removal from 95% O2, acting through the FGF-R1, would be critical for compensatory growth. Intraperitoneal injection of soluble truncated FGF-R1 at the onset of the recovery phase arrested compensatory lung DNA synthesis and secondary septation seen in control animals after 3 days of recovery, confirming a role for FGF-R1 in this model of compensatory neonatal lung growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".