MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027581993 · doi:10.1117/12.844020

2D/3D registration using only single-view fluoroscopy to guide cardiac ablation procedures: a feasibility study

2010· article· en· W2027581993 on OpenAlexaff
Pascal Fallavollita

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluoroscopyImaging phantomAblationCatheterComputer scienceVentricleCatheter ablationNuclear medicineMedicineBiomedical engineeringRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CARTO XP is an electroanatomical cardiac mapping system that provides 3D color-coded maps of the electrical activity of the heart, however it is expensive and it can only use a single costly magnetic catheter for each patient intervention. Aim: To develop an affordable fluoroscopic navigation system that could shorten the duration of RF ablation procedures and increase its efficacy. Methodology: A 4-step filtering technique was implemented in order to project the tip electrode of an ablation catheter visible in single-view C-arm images in order to calculate its width. The width is directly proportional to the depth of the catheter. Results: For phantom experimentation, when displacing a 7- French catheter at 1cm intervals away from an X-ray source, the recovered depth using a single image was 2.05 ± 1.47 mm, whereas depth errors improved to 1.55 ± 1.30 mm when using an 8-French catheter. In clinic experimentation, twenty posterior and left lateral images of a catheter inside the left ventricle of a mongrel dog were acquired. The standard error of estimate for the recovered depth of the tip-electrode of the mapping catheter was 13.1 mm and 10.1 mm respectively for the posterior and lateral views. Conclusions: A filtering implementation using single-view C-arm images showed that it was possible to recover depth in phantom study and proved adequate in clinical experimentation based on isochronal map fusion results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207