The effects of airway closure in central apneas and obstructed respiratory efforts in mixed apneas in preterm infants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Airway closure during central apnea could allow for better gas exchange. However, the return of inspiratory efforts against a closed airway may cause greater desaturation and prolongation of apnea. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of patency of the airway and obstructed respiratory efforts on the length of apneas and the degree and slope of O(2) desaturation and bradycardia. METHODS: All mixed apneas observed in 15 preterms were matched 1:2 with the longest central apneas in each infant. Central apneas were further classified using the amplified cardiac airflow oscillation in those with airway open and in those with airway closed. RESULTS: No differences were found in the length of apnea, slope of O(2) desaturation, delay between the onset of apnea and onset of desaturation, lowest post-apneic SpO(2), and time of recovery of SpO(2) between central apneas with and without airway closure. Although mixed apneas were significantly longer than central apneas, their initial central component was significantly shorter than the length of central apneas. In mixed apneas, the onset of O(2) desaturation occurred faster, SpO(2) decreased lower, and recovered slower compared with central apneas. The slope of O(2) desaturation after the obstructed respiratory efforts was significantly greater than before the obstructed respiratory efforts. CONCLUSIONS: In preterm infants: (1) airway closure during central apneas does not limit oxygen desaturation; (2) respiratory efforts against a closed airway prolong apnea and worsen the degree of desaturation and bradycardia. Although respiratory efforts are not necessary to induce airway closure, inspiratory efforts against a closed airway could trigger inhibitory cardio-respiratory responses causing significant desaturation, bradycardia, and prolongation of apnea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".