The Multilateral Fund and China's Compliance With the Montreal Protocol
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
International financial assistance can encourage developing countries to deal with global environmental problems, but there is little empirical study of the specific design features most important for success. This article examines the effect of the Multilateral Fund (MLF) on China's negotiation of and compliance with the Montreal Protocol. Access to the MLF was a major impetus for China's ratification of the protocol and the government's procedural compliance. Because it closed major loopholes, the sector-based approach to funding was far more effective than the project-by-project approach, leading to China's ultimate success in meeting the protocol's targets to freeze consumption and production of chlorofluorocarbons by 1999 and halons by 2002. China's experience suggests that effective international financial assistance mechanisms should make continuous fund eligibility contingent on evidence of successful compliance with treaty obligations, target sectors in which manufacturers have limited incentives to meet treaty obligations on their own, and use market-based instruments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it