MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027658897 · doi:10.1055/s-2009-1216420

From the Bench to the Bedside: How Natural Products Can Find Their Way

2009· article· en· W2027658897 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Thomas Efferth

Bibliographic record

VenuePlanta Medica · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseAgricultural Research ServiceUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationNational Science Foundation of Sri LankaUniversity of ColomboU.S. Department of AgricultureWestern Carolina UniversityInternational Science CouncilChinese Academy of SciencesKurukshetra UniversityNational Center for Complementary and Alternative MedicineChina Academy of Traditional Chinese MedicineNational Institutes of HealthNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityNational Science FoundationDeutsche KrebshilfeNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaTata TrustsUniversity Grants CommissionWake Forest University
KeywordsArtemisia annuaArtesunateBiologyArtemisininThioredoxinPharmacologyBiochemistryGeneImmunologyPlasmodium falciparum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Secondary metabolites from plants serve as defense against herbivores, microbes, viruses, or competing plants. Many medicinal plants have pharmacological activities and may, thus, be a source for novel treatment strategies. We have systematically analyzed medicinal plants used in traditional Chinese medicine during the past decade and focused our interest on Artemisia annua L. (qinhao, sweet wormwood). We found that the active principle of Artemisia annua L., artemisinin, exerts not only anti-malarial activity but also profound cytotoxicity against tumor cells. The inhibitory activity of artemisinin and its derivatives towards cancer cells is in the nano- to micromolar range. Candidate genes that may contribute to the sensitivity and resistance of tumor cells to artemisinins were identified by pharmacogenomic and molecular pharmacological approaches. Target validation was performed using cell lines transfected with candidate genes or corresponding knockout cells. These genes are from classes with different biological functions; for example, regulation of proliferation (BUB3, cyclins, CDC25A), angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, matrix metalloproteinase-9, angiostatin, thrombospondin-1) or apoptosis (BCL-2, BAX). Artesunate triggers apoptosis both by p53-dependent and -independent pathways. Anti-oxidant stress genes (thioredoxin, catalase, ƒ×-glutamyl-cysteine synthetase, glutathione S-transferases) as well as the epidermal growth factor receptor confer resistance to artesunate. Cell lines over-expressing genes that confer resistance to established anti-tumor drugs (MDR1, MRP1, BCRP, dihydrofolate reductase, ribonucleotide reductase) were not cross-resistant to artesunate, indicating that artesunate is not involved in multidrug resistance. The anticancer activity of artesunate has also been shown in human xenograft tumors in mice. First encouraging experiences were obtained in the clinical treatment of patients suffering from uveal melanoma. A phase I with artesunate in metastasized breast cancer has been launched in 2008. References: [1] Efferth T, et al. (2001) Int J Oncol 18: 767–773. [2] Efferth T, et al. (2002) J Mol Med 80: 233–242. [3] Efferth T, et al. (2002) Biochem Pharmacol 64: 617–623. [4] Efferth T, et al. (2003) Int J Oncol 23: 1231–1235. [5] Efferth T, et al. (2003) Mol Pharmacol 64: 382–394. [6] Efferth T, et al. (2004) Free Rad Biol Med 37: 998–1009. [7] Efferth T, et al. (2004) Biochem Pharmacol 67: 1689–1799. [8] Dell'Eva R, et al. (2004) Biochem Pharmacol 68: 2359–2366. [9] Efferth T, (2005) Drug Res Updates 8: 85–97. [10] Efferth T, (2006) Curr Drug Targets 7: 407–421. [11] Efferth T, (2007) Planta Med 73: 299–309. [12] Kelter G, et al. (2007) PLoS One 2: e798. [13] Efferth T, et al. (2007) Trends Mol Med 13: 353–361. [14] Efferth T, et al. (2007) Curr Med Chem. 14: 2024–2032. [15] Efferth T, et al. (2008) Mol Cancer Ther 7: 152–61. [16] Li PCH, et al (2008) Cancer Res 68: 4347–51.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlanta MedicaSame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207