Cisplatin adducts of d(CCTCTG*G*TCTCC)·d(GGAGACCAGAGG) in aqueous solution by vibrational circular dichroism spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The vibrational circular dichroism (VCD) and IR absorption spectra of a dodecamer d(CCTCTGGTCTCC).d(GGAGACCAGAGG) coordinated with cisplatin are distinct compared to those of the dodecamer without cisplatin. Although the intensity of PO(2)/deoxyribose absorptions (1150-850 cm(-1)) increases noticeably relative to those of the carbonyl and ring deformations of the bases (1750-1500 cm(-1)), the VCD spectra differ to a much greater extent. Overlapping positive and negative bands can be assigned relatively easily to individual vibrational modes. The effect of platination on the dodecamer duplex is expressed most prominently in VCD arising solely from the vibrations of the guanines bound to the platinum atom. The effect on the VCD features of other bases leads to minute wavenumber shifts at most. These observations are in agreement with previous NMR and X-ray experiments on the same oligonucleotide. The assignment of the absorption and VCD bands strongly resembles those of the octamer duplex d(CCTGGTCC).d(GGACCAGG) when coordinated with platinum. The spectra of the dodecamer did not indicate any isomerization of the complex with time, as is clearly the case for the octamer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".