MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027736827 · doi:10.1021/bp0300321

Evaluation of Multiwavelength Culture Fluorescence for Monitoring the Aroma Compound 4-Hydroxy-2(or 5)-ethyl-5(or 2)-methyl-3(2H)-furanone (HEMF) Production

2004· article· en· W2027736827 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Hagedorn, Wayne Levadoux, Denis Groleau, B. Tartakovsky

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology Progress · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research Institute
FundersHelmholtz Energy Materials Foundry
KeywordsFluorescenceChemistryEthyl acetateMetabolitePartial least squares regressionChromatographyFermentationGlycerolEthanolFluorescence spectroscopyFiberBioreactorAnalytical Chemistry (journal)BiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluorescence spectra of a 4-hydroxy-2(or 5)-ethyl-5(or 2)-methyl-3(2H)-furanone (HEMF) fermentation culture broth were combined with measurable process variables for off-line and on-line process monitoring. Culture broth fluorescence in UV and visible ranges was acquired by a fiber optic LCD array spectrometer. Process dynamics was followed on-line using a fiber optic probe attached to an external recirculation loop of the bioreactor. Partial least squares and stepwise regression methods were used to correlate measurable process parameters with the components of the fluorescence spectra. Both methods provided adequate approximation of yeast density, HEMF, glucose, and ethanol concentrations from fluorescence spectra. HEMF production was observed during the oxido-reductive growth phase when there was a lack of measurable oxygen in the culture broth and an excess of glucose. The addition of glucose resulted in the rapid production of HEMF and other metabolite intermediates such as ethanol, acetate, and glycerol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology ProgressSame topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207