Birefringence enhancement in annealed TiO2 thin films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Postdeposition thermal annealing is used to enhance the form birefringence of nanostructured TiO2 thin films grown by electron-beam evaporation using the serial bideposition technique. Thin films were grown on fused silica substrates using oblique deposition angles between 60° and 75° and repetitive 180° substrate rotations to produce birefringent thin films that are structurally anisotropic. Postdeposition annealing in air, between 200 and 900°C, was used to increase the form birefringence of the films by changing the TiO2 phase from the as-deposited amorphous state to a polycrystalline state that exhibits a greater inherent density and larger bulk refractive index. The optical properties, microstructure, and crystallinity were characterized by Mueller matrix ellipsometry, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and x-ray diffraction. It was found that the in-plane birefringence increased significantly upon thermal annealing, in some cases yielding birefringence values that doubled in magnitude, from 0.11 to 0.22 at a wavelength of 550nm for films annealed at 400°C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".