Effect of Long‐Term Vigabatrin Administration on the Immature Rat Brain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether the neuropathologic changes produced by vigabatrin (VGB; gamma-vinyl GABA) administration in the developing rat brain are reversible. METHODS: We injected rats daily with VGB (25-40 mg/kg/day, s.c.) from age 12 days for 2 weeks followed by 2 weeks of a drug-free period. Behavioral testing, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, biochemical assays, and histologic technique were used to assess the adverse effect of VGB in developing brain and its reversibility. RESULTS: At the end of 2 weeks' VGB administration: (a) there was a hyperactivity and a shortened latency to escape out of cool water; (b) white matter appeared hyperintense in T2 and diffusion-weighted MR images with 4-15% increases in T2; (c) microvacuolation, TUNEL-positive nuclei, and swollen axons were observed in the corpus callosum; (d) myelin staining indicated a reduction in myelination, as did the reduction in activities of myelin and oligodendrocyte-associated enzymes and the decrease in myelin basic protein on Western blots. Two weeks after stopping VGB administration: (a) MR images were normal, and microvacuolation was no longer in the white matter; (b) reduction in myelination reversed partially; (c) the T2 relaxation time remained elevated in the hypothalamus; and (d) the behavioral response remained abnormal. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term VGB administration to young rats causes brain injury, which recovers partially on its cessation. The observed cell death, disrupted myelination, and alterations in behavior indicate a need for further safety assessment in infants and children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".