MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027937531 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v5n9p148

Estimation of Natural Gas Demand in Industry Sector of Iran: A Nonlinear Approach

2013· article· en· W2027937531 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alireza H. Kani, M. Abbasspour, Zahra Abedi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural gasEconomicsNatural gas pricesEconometricsValue (mathematics)Variable (mathematics)Oil and natural gasPetroleum industryConsumption (sociology)EstimationElectricityMicroeconomicsFossil fuelNatural resource economicsEnvironmental scienceMathematicsStatisticsEnvironmental engineeringChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper attempt to estimate the natural gas demand function in Industry Sector of Iran for the period 1971 to 2009 using a regime-switching model entitled Smooth Transition Auto-regression model (STAR). To this end, explanatory variables such as value added of industry sector, real price of natural gas, real price of oil products, and real price of electricity are employed as variables influencing natural gas consumption in industry sector of Iran. The results show that natural gas demand in industry sector follows an LSTR1 model as a two-regime nonlinear model if real price of oil products is assumed as transition variable. The estimation results show that the slope parameter equals a high value of 10 and the threshold extreme value stands at 50.29 Rials per each liter of oil products consumed (Note 1). The results also indicate that in both regimes, value added of industry sector and real price of electricity have a positive and significant relation, and real price of natural gas has a reverse and significant relation with natural gas demand in industry sector. Further, real price of oil products does not have any significant relation with natural gas demand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesFrench-language works237,207