MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027975827 · doi:10.1111/anae.12304

The safety of an interscalene catheter‐over‐needle technique

2013· letter· en· W2027975827 on OpenAlexaff
Vivian Ip, Ban C. H. Tsui

Bibliographic record

VenueAnaesthesia · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsAlberta Hospital EdmontonUniversity of Alberta Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCatheterRegional anaesthesiaRegional anesthesiaSurgeryAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We read with great interest the case report by Yanovski et al. 1, and the accompanying editorial by Fredrickson et al. 2, reporting the death of a patient following local anaesthetic bolus through an interscalene catheter whose tip was in an intrathecal position. We previously reported a case where the interscalene catheter tip was situated near the phrenic nerve in an asthmatic patient who suffered respiratory embarrassment 3. Together, these reports reinforce the problem of the traditional catheter-through-needle insertion technique: overfeeding of the catheter beyond the needle tip to compensate for subsequent removal of the needle. This can lead to unpredictable catheter tip placement, even under ultrasound guidance. To overcome this problem, we introduced a refined catheter-over-needle (CON) technique 4. We have been using a Pajunk MultiSet 21156-40E CON assembly (Pajunk, Geisingen, Germany) for almost a year and, since its introduction, we have been able to ascertain the final catheter tip position for multiple peripheral block locations, including interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, femoral and popliteal. The CON technique is relatively simple and relies on two major components: an outer catheter sheath and a flexible, kink-resistant inner catheter (Fig. 1). For interscalene block, a 21-G needle, housed within the outer catheter and with its distal, electrically conductive end protruding, is used to position the distal catheter tip between C6 and C7 nerve roots, just adjacent to the scalenus anterior muscle. A 13-6 MHz high frequency linear ultrasound transducer (HFL 38, M-Turbo; SonoSite, Bothell, WA) provides real-time ultrasound guidance. Subsequently, the needle is withdrawn and the inner catheter, whose length is similar to that of the needle, is inserted into the outer catheter. Thus, the inner catheter literally replaces the needle without the need for overfeeding and enables the inner catheter tip to be in the desired position. The outer catheter provides support, allowing the inner catheter tip to adopt a linear structure that can be observed clearly on the ultrasound screen (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the risk of leakage and dislodgement 5 are substantially lower because the needle puncture hole is smaller than the outer catheter diameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnaesthesiaSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207