MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Electromyographic Study of Low-Velocity Rear-End Impacts

2002· article· en· W2027980013 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Canadian institutionsAlberta Hospital EdmontonUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWhiplashTorsoSternocleidomastoid muscleKinematicsElectromyographyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAccelerationBiomechanicsCadaverAccelerometerAnatomyPoison controlPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Experimental analysis was performed to determine the effects of low-velocity rear-end impacts on phasic and magnitudinal activity of the cervical muscles in expected and unexpected conditions. OBJECTIVES: To determine the phasic response of the cervical muscles to increasing low-velocity rear-end impacts, and to compare the quantitative effects of awareness and unawareness of impending impact. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The literature contains little information on the etiology of whiplash injuries. Animal and cadaver studies have yielded some insight into the phenomenon. However, in vivo studies of the cervical muscular response and head-neck kinematics to low-velocity impacts are rare. METHODS: Seven healthy volunteers were subjected to rear-end impacts of 4.9, 8.8, 10.8, and 13.7 m/s2 acceleration at two levels of expectation: expected and unexpected. Bilateral electromyograms of the sternocleidomastoids, trapezii, and splenii capitis were recorded. Triaxial accelerometers recorded the acceleration of the chair, torso at the shoulder level, and head of the participant. RESULTS: At an acceleration of 13.7 m/s2, the sternocleidomastoids generated up to 179% of their maximal voluntary contraction electromyogram, whereas the splenii and trapezii did not exceed 35% of their maximal voluntary contraction in most of the experimental conditions. Electromyographic variables were significantly affected by the levels of acceleration and expectation (P < 0.001). The onset time and peak electromyogram time for the sternocleidomastoid progressively decreased with increasing levels of acceleration. The kinetic variables and the electromyographic variables regressed significantly on the acceleration (P < 0.01), explaining from 96% to 100% of the variability. CONCLUSIONS: Muscle responses were greater with higher levels of acceleration. Because the muscular component of the head-neck complex plays a central role in the abatement of higher acceleration levels, it may be a primary site of injury in the whiplash phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it