Effect of <i>Microsphaeropsis</i> sp. on the Production of Perithecia and Ascospores of <i>Gibberella zeae</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potential of Microsphaeropsis sp. (isolate P130A) as an antagonist of Gibberella zeae was tested under in vitro and field conditions. Firstly, an in vitro method of ascospore production was developed on wheat and corn residues. The plant type (corn or wheat), residue type (straw/stalk or grain), and incubation conditions (closed or open) had a significant effect on ascospore production. Perithecia were more abundant on wheat and corn grain incubated under open conditions. On these two substrates, the application of Microsphaeropsis sp. significantly reduced ascospore production. On wheat, the antagonist had a significant effect when applied 2 weeks before (-2), at the same time (0), and 4 weeks after (+4) inoculation with G. zeae, with 1.73, 0.31, 1.11, and 1.36 log ascospores per cm 2 for the control, -2, 0, and +4 weeks treatments, respectively. On corn, Microsphaeropsis sp. had a significant effect when applied 2 weeks before, at the same time, 4 weeks after, and 6 weeks after inoculation with G. zeae with 3.02, 0.23, 1.29, 2.35, and 2.22 log ascospores per cm 2 for the control, -2, 0, +4, and +6 weeks treatments, respectively. When applied to crop residues in the field as postharvest or preplanting applications, Microsphaeropsis sp. had no effect on the pattern of perithecia maturation, but significantly reduced the number of perithecia produced on two sampling dates, May 1998 and July 1999. There is a potential to biologically reduce the initial inoculum of G. zeae; however, more work is needed to optimize the efficacy of the biocontrol agent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".