Concurrent exposure to thermal stress and oral Ag induces intestinal sensitization in the mouse by a mechanism of regulation of IL‐12 expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanism of food allergy remains unclear. The absorption of intact protein Ag into the intestinal tissue is a prerequisite in the development of intestinal sensitization. Previous studies indicate that thermal stress compromises the intestinal barrier function. Mice were concurrently exposed to thermal stress and oral Ag. Intestinal sensitivity, levels of serum-specific IgE, IL-4 and INF-gamma were assessed. Intestinal dendritic cell, Th1 and Th2 functions were determined. The mice that were treated with thermal stress and oral Ag showed high levels of serum Ag-specific IgE, intestinal mast cell activation in response to oral Ag challenge, suppression of IL-12 expression in the intestinal dendritic cells, inhibition of T-bet expression and Th1 function and marked increases in (GATA)3 expression and Th2 function. Mice exposed to thermal stress alone or oral Ag alone did not show any signs of the intestinal sensitization. Pretreatment with IL-12 inhibited the intestinal sensitization induced by the concurrent exposure to thermal stress and Ag gavage. We conclude that although Ag absorption is essential, Ag absorption alone is insufficient; other accessory factors that can disturb the local immune homeostasis are also required for the induction of intestinal sensitization. The present study illustrates that concurrent exposure to thermal stress and oral Ag can prove to be a factor in the induction of intestinal sensitization by a mechanism of regulating IL-12 expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".