MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028055064 · doi:10.1021/jp0261962

<sup>14</sup>N Quadrupolar, <sup>14</sup>N and <sup>15</sup>N Chemical Shift, and <sup>14</sup>N−H Dipolar Tensors of Sulfamic Acid

2002· article· en· W2028055064 on OpenAlexaff
Gerard S. Harbison, Young-Sik Kye, Glenn H. Penner, Michelle Grandin, Martine Monette

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of GuelphBruker (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrupoleChemistryCoupling constantAnisotropyChemical shiftDipoleTensor (intrinsic definition)Ab initio quantum chemistry methodsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Ab initioCrystallographyAtomic physicsNuclear magnetic resonancePhysical chemistryMoleculePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 14 N solid-state NMR single crystal study was used to determine the 14 N quadrupolar, chemical shift, and 14 N− 1 H dipolar tensors of sulfamic acid. The quadrupolar tensor is nearly axially symmetric, with the quasi-unique axis aligned 3° away from the N−S bond. The quadrupole coupling constant of 0.794 MHz is substantially less than the gas-phase value (1.6682 MHz); ab initio calculations show that the difference can be attributed almost entirely to the significantly shorter N−S bond in the solid state. The single crystal study, together with 15 N CP/MAS and CP/static experiments, yields an isotropic chemical shift that lies close to its solution value, and a chemical shielding anisotropy of about −80 ppm, and the dipolar couplings are about 10% smaller than computed from the neutron structure, probably because of vibrational averaging. All three tensors are almost collinear. HF, MP2, CI, and DFT(B3LYP) calculations of the nitrogen quadrupole coupling constant and shielding are also reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207