MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028073033 · doi:10.1002/cjce.20387

Breakup of drops around the edges of Rushton turbine

2010· article· en· W2028073033 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Pramod S. Patil, Sanjeev Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Mixing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreakupDrop (telecommunication)Rushton turbineImpellerSurface tensionPhysicsViscosityParticle sizeThermodynamicsMaterials scienceMechanicsOpticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A detailed experimental and simulation study has been carried out in the present work to understand drop breakup in regions around the edge of the Rushton turbine in agitated vessels. The effect of impeller speed, impeller size, interfacial tension, and the viscosities of the two phases is studied on drop breakup through their effect on d max , the size of the largest drop in the system, and the whole size distribution. The measurements were carried out using Galai particle size analyser and optical microscope. Experimental analysis shows that the d max , maximum stable drop diameter varies with impeller tip velocity to the power −1. The variation of d max with interfacial tension is studied using different surfactants. The effect of viscosity ratio, achieved by changing the dispersed phase viscosity, on d max is captured. For the same d max values obtained from two different dispersed phases show that the wider drop size distribution is observed for higher dispersed phase viscosity. Une étude expérimentale et de simulation détaillée a été réalisée dans ce travail dans le but de comprendre la rupture de gouttes dans les zones près de l'extrémité de la turbine Rushton dans des cuves agitées. L'effet de la vitesse de l'impulseur, de la taille de l'impulseur, de la tension interfaciale et des viscosités des deux phases est étudié sur la rupture de gouttes par leur effet sur le diamètre de goutte stable maximal, la taille de la plus grosse goutte du système et la distribution pour toute la taille. Les mesures ont été effectuées à l'aide d'un analyseur granulométrique Galai et d'un microscope optique. Une analyse expérimentale démontre que le diamètre de goutte stable maximal varie avec une vélocité du bout de l'impulseur à la puissance ‐1. La variation du diamètre de goutte stable maximal avec la tension interfaciale est étudiée à l'aide de différents surfactifs. L'effet de viscosité relative, atteint en changeant la viscosité de phase dispersée, sur le diamètre de goutte stable maximal est capté. Les mêmes valeurs de diamètre de goutte stable maximal obtenues de deux phases dispersées différentes indiquent que la distribution des plus grosses gouttes est observée pour la viscosité de phase dispersée supérieure. Can. J. Chem. Eng. © 2010 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicFluid Dynamics and MixingFrench-language works237,207