MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028076237 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2002.86.2.131

Volatile Fingerprinting (SPME-GC-FID) to Detect and Discriminate Diseases of Potato Tubers

2002· article· en· W2028076237 on OpenAlexafffund
Ajjamada C. Kushalappa, C. R. Chen, B. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsErwiniaPythium ultimumBiologyInoculationPhytophthora infestansGas chromatographyFusariumBacteriaHorticultureBotanyChromatographyChemistryBiological pest controlBlight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Volatiles from Russet Burbank potatoes inoculated with Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora, E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica, Pythium ultimum, Phytophthora infestans, or Fusarium sambucinum were monitored by sampling the head space 3, 4, and 5 days after inoculation, using a solid phase microextraction (SPME) fiber to trap and gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC-FID) to fingerprint volatiles. Noninoculated (NON) potatoes served as the control. Volatile fingerprints varied among diseases. Within a disease, the fingerprints varied with time since inoculation and among blocks. In general, more volatiles were observed on the fourth and fifth day after inoculation than on the third day. The amount of volatile compounds produced (peak area) within a disease group increased with incubation time; however, the variation among blocks was much higher. The amount of volatiles produced, in general, was associated with disease severity. Disease-specific volatiles were observed. The F. sambucinum chromatogram had two unique peaks at retention time (RT) = 14.1 and 17.3 min. P. infestans produced few peaks and the profile was quite similar to NON. In contrast, E. carotovora subsp. carotovora, E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica, and Pythium ultimum produced many peaks, and the P. ultimum was different from the bacteria, in that the chromatogram peaks at RT = 4.04 and 8.76 min were absent. Instead, it produced a distinct peak at RT = 1.71 min. E. carotovora subsp. carotovora and E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica couldn't be discriminated based on unique peaks; however, they varied in concentration of volatiles produced. E. carotovora subsp. carotovora produced more of RT = 2.0 min and less of RT = 2.3 and 2.44 min than E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica. A back-propagation network (using neural networks) was developed to classify volatile profiles into six disease-groups. Cross-validation classification probabilities were NON = 71, E. carotovora subsp. carotovora = 71, E. carotovora subsp. atroseptica = 71, P. ultimum = 67, Phytophthora infestans = 46, and F. sambucinum = 75%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207