MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028081947 · doi:10.1149/1.3253653

Evaluation of Metal Supported Ceria Based Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Fabricated by Wet Powder Spray and Sintering

2009· article· en· W2028081947 on OpenAlexafffund
Naoki Oishi, Yeong Yoo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceSinteringCathodeSolid oxide fuel cellAnodeElectrolyteOxidePolarization (electrochemistry)ElectrodePorosityChemical engineeringHydrogenOhmic contactDielectric spectroscopyMetallurgyComposite materialElectrochemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A ceria based solid oxide fuel cell was fabricated onto a porous stainless steel support by sintering process. The metal supported cell was composed of a porous AISI430 support, a anode, a electrolyte, and a cathode. A cell was tested at for up to 2700 h on humidified argon balanced hydrogen and air. The cell showed no signs of degradation over 1200 h at low current densities of 0.16 and ; however, under a high current density of , the cell voltage dropped by 25% in 1400 h. Impedance measurements showed a sharp increase in polarization resistance that could be associated with the cathode. Ohmic resistances from the oxide scale and electrodes did not significantly contribute to the overall resistance, while electrode polarization resistance accounted for more than half of the overall resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207