Influence of pH on the Formation of Glucan by<i>Lactobacillus reuteri</i>TMW 1.106 Exerting a Protective Function Against Extreme pH Values
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lactobacillus reuteri TMW 1.106, a dominant type II sourdough bacterium, produces glucan from sucrose in vitro and in situ. Exopolysaccharides positively affect the texture and mouth feel of foods and their in situ production in fermented foods could be an alternative to the addition of hydrocolloids from plants or non-GRAS microorganisms. The aim of this study was to elucidate a probable function of the EPS for the bacterium. Lb. reuteri TMW 1.106 harbors two glucosyltransferases, Gtf106A and Gtf106B and produces a dextran. Gtf106B exhibited hydrolysis but no transferase activity. Enzymatic production of dextran with the heterologously expressed, N-terminally truncated ΔN Gtf106A was highest at a pH of 4.0, whereas dextran formation in pH static fermentations was optimal between pH 4.7 and 5.4. The dextran synthesised at these pH values had the highest molecular mass (1.2 × 107) and 15% α–(1–4) linkages. A protective effect of this EPS on Lb. reuteri TMW 1.106 against low pH, explaining the low pH-production maximum, could be demonstrated through the delay of cell death.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".