MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028170285 · doi:10.1055/s-0028-1100919

Development of a whole disc organ culture system to study human intervertebral disc

2010· article· en· W2028170285 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Cristina Parolin, Rahul Gawri, F. Mwale, Thomas Steffen, Peter J. Roughley, John Antoniou, Peter Jarzem, Lisbet Haglund, Jean Ouellet

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-Based Spine-Care Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervertebral discOrgan cultureDegeneration (medical)Regeneration (biology)MedicineLow back painPathologyAnatomyBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY TYPE: Basic science Objective: Low back pain is one of the most common health problems1 and is strongly associated with intervertebral disc degeneration, (IVD). Current treatments remove the symptoms without reversing or even retarding the underlying problem. Development of new therapy for the regeneration of the degenerative IVD is complicated by the lack of a validated long-term organ culture model in which therapeutic candidates can be studied. The object of this study was to develop, optimize, and validate an organ culture model for human IVD, allowing for the study of degeneration and the potential for regeneration of the human IVD. METHODS: From eleven donors, an average of 5-6 IVDs were obtained. Inclusion criteria were; age between 50 and 70 years old, no history of cancer, chemotherapy, diabetes, or liver cirrhosis. An x-ray of the harvested spine was done to assess the grade of degeneration. Three different methods for isolating the discs were studied: with bony endplate (BEP), without endplate (NEP), and with cartilage endplate (CEP). Discs were cultured for 4 weeks without external load, in Dulbecco's modified eagle media with glucose and fetal bovine serum (FBS). Four different combinations of concentrations of glucose and FBS were compared: low glucose-low FBS, low glucose-high FBS, high glucose-low FBS, and high glucose-high FBS.2 Short-term cultures (1 week) were performed to compare the cell viability of the three methods of isolating the discs. Swelling potential on NEP and CEP discs from the same donor were evaluated. After four weeks of culture, a 4 mm punch was taken from CEP discs and cell viability was evaluated using a live/dead assay with confocal microscopy. RESULTS: Analyzing the potential of swelling in CEP discs, there was an increase in volume to a maximum of 25% and retention of shape and morphology. Whereas in NEP discs, there was an excessive deformation and a two-fold time increase in volume than CEP discs. The cell viability in short-term cultures is around 40%-50% in the BEP model, 50%-60% in the NEP model and > 96% in the CEP model. BEP isolated discs show endplate necrosis that begins after 4 days of culture. Cell viability in CEP discs was evaluated at 4 weeks in three different areas of the disc: nucleus pulposus, inner annulus fibrosus, and outer annulus fibrosus. We found no difference in live cells (> 96%) between the four different concentrations of FBS and glucose (Table 1). [Table: see text] CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a novel method to isolate human IVDs and optimized the culture conditions. The CEP method has been proven to be superior to the previous models (NEP and BEP) in cell viability and maintaining physiologic swelling.3 In the long-term cultures, the CEP system maintained sufficient nutrient supply and high cell survival in all regions of the discs even with low concentrations of FBS and glucose. The availability of an intact disc organ culture system has a considerable advantage over the culture of isolated disc cells, as it maintains the cells in their unique microenvironment, making any response to catabolic or anabolic agents more physiologically relevant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvidence-Based Spine-Care JournalSame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207