MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028180781 · doi:10.1097/ijg.0b013e31818fa73b

Replacement of Ahmed Aqueous Drainage Devices in Eyes With Device-related Complications

2009· article· en· W2028180781 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Smith, Yvonne M. Buys, Graham E. Trope

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Glaucoma · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryGlaucomaIntraocular pressureUveitisOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To examine the results of removal and simultaneous replacement of Ahmed aqueous drainage devices (ADDs), which require removal due to complications. METHODS: Noncomparative retrospective case series of 6 patients. RESULTS: For the period from January 1999 to December 2007, 325 Ahmed ADD insertions were performed in 272 patients. From this, we identified 6 patients (1.8%) who underwent removal of an ADD for device-associated complications. All had replacement of the Ahmed ADD in a different quadrant at the same surgery. The mean time interval from the original valve insertion was 31.2 months (median, 32.5; range, 3 to 67 mo). The indication for tube removal was chronic uveitis in 3 patients, plate exposure in 2 patients, and tube exposure in 1 patient. We examined the results at 12 months postsimultaneous removal and replacement of the ADD and at final follow-up (median, 25 mo; range, 13 to 52 mo). The preoperative complications resolved in all cases, with the inflammation settling postoperatively in the patients with preoperative uveitis and no patients developing tube or plate exposure at last follow-up. The mean preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was 16.0 mm Hg (median, 15.0; range, 9 to 29 mm Hg). At 12 months and final review, the mean IOP was 10.8 mm Hg (median, 10.0; range, 1 to 24 mm Hg) and 11.0 mm Hg (median, 10.0; range, 3 to 24 mm Hg), respectively. The mean number of glaucoma medications preoperatively was 2.8 (median, 3.5; range, 0 to 5). This was reduced to 1.7 (median, 1.5; range, 0 to 4) at 12 months and 2.2 (median, 1.5; range, 0 to 5) at final follow-up. Of the 6 cases in this series, 4 (66.6%) were considered to have adequate IOP control postoperatively. One patient developed postoperative hypotony, with an IOP of 4 mm Hg and reduced vision due to hypotony maculopathy. This patient declined further surgical intervention. One patient had a preoperative IOP of 29 mm Hg on 4 drops and acetazolamide 250 mg b.i.d. At 14 months postsurgery, IOP was 24 mm Hg on 4 drops and the patient underwent insertion of a second ADD. At last follow-up 14 months later, IOP was 10 mm Hg on 4 drops. There were no other significant intraoperative or postoperative complications in this series. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who require removal of Ahmed ADDs due to complications, removal of the offending ADD and replacement in another quadrant is effective in both resolving the complications and maintaining IOP control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of GlaucomaSame topicOcular Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207