Validation and Clinical Relevance of a French-Canadian Version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire in Adolescent Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective validation study of a crosscultural adaptation of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ). OBJECTIVE: To provide a French-Canadian version of the SAQ. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The SAQ is widely used for the assessment of appearance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. METHODS: French translation/back-translation of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire-French version (SAQ-fv) was done by an expert committee. Its reliability was measured using the intradomain correlation coefficient, concurrent validity by using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Outcomes Questionnaire, and discriminant validity using analysis of variance, on 182 consecutive patients attending a scoliosis clinic. RESULTS: Intradomain correlations were weak to excellent (ρ = 0.34-0.76, P < 0.01), indicating that the scales' items demonstrated a satisfactory internal coherence. Scores comparison between SAQ-fv items and SRS Outcomes Questionnaire domains showed weak to moderate correlations (ρ = 0.35-0.53, P < 0.01) for the self-image domain, as expected in this test of convergent validity. A clear gradient in SAQ-fv scores according to Cobb angles was found in every domain, and patients' perception of their rib prominence was significantly related to the rib hump measurement, showing good discriminant validity. Body mass index, age, Risser, and gender did not influence the questionnaire scores. Preoperative patients' and parents' scores were significantly more affected when compared with other groups (observation, braced, and postoperative). Distribution of scores in the first section of the questionnaire shows a positive skew toward the wellbeing end of the response scales. However, the other section shows an inversed bell-shape distribution. CONCLUSION: The SAQ-fv showed satisfactory reliability and validity in French-Canadian adolescents with different severity of idiopathic scoliosis. Spinal deformity appearance evaluation using this tool was found to be independent of patient's general characteristics. In addition, the SAQ-fv is able to discriminate between relevant clinical values, thus providing useful information for the clinical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".