MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Utilizing SOA-ready devices for virtual power plant control in semantic-enabled Smart Grid Analyzing IEC 61850 and OPC UA integration methodology

2011· article· en· W2028197972 on OpenAlexaff
Stjepan Sučić, Ante Martinić, Denis Francesconi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIEC 61850Smart gridAutomationComputer scienceEmbedded systemService-oriented architectureSystems engineeringDistributed computingServerOpen architectureEngineeringOperating systemWeb serviceElectrical engineeringWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Evolution of existing power systems towards the Smart Grids has highlighted a great number of potential pitfalls and unsolved issues which are postponing its streamlined progress. Collective control of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) through the model of Virtual Power Plant (VPP) is one of the key Smart Grid concepts lacking the capability of seamless integration. The IEC 61850 standard defines future-proof automation architecture with core relevance to the Smart Grid. One of the main IEC 61850 contributions are semantic data models describing variety of utility subsystems including DERs. The possibility of using DERs semantics with state-of-the-art industrial automation technologies, such as OPC UA (Unified Architecture), could significantly reduce VPP integration time frame. This article demonstrates how IEC 61850 can benefit from OPC UA technology and accelerate the Smart Grid development. OPC UA is based on Service Oriented Architecture (SOA). It is shown how SOA paradigm provides a value-added feature for controlling VPPs. As a result of analyzing integration methodology between IEC 61850 and OPC UA and by presenting DER servers as SOA-ready devices, VPP automation architecture is proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicService-Oriented Architecture and Web ServicesFrench-language works237,207