Alcohol in Danish and German Educational Print-Media (1990-1998): A Comparison
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractDenmark and Germany have similarities regarding their drinking patterns and alcohol policies, although they differ in their way of health promotion concerning alcohol consumption: the governmental health service in Denmark tending more towards a moderate consumption, and Germany tending rather towards near-total abstinence. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the influence of particular interest groups on alcohol policy by analyses of educational print-media about alcohol. The results show that German educational print-media denounce alcohol as a dangerous drug, while the Danish health service balances the positive effects of alcohol against its negative ones. Alcohol-related problems are related to harmful alcohol consumption in Denmark, and to any alcohol consumption in Germany. The ideological background for these strategies is connected to medical circles in Denmark, and temperance groups in Germany. In Germany, the strong position of the temperance groups supported by the then ruling conservative party, and the national virtuous attitude to temperance, most likely account for the more "restrictive" German approach.KeywordsGermanyDenmarkPrint-mediaTemperancePrevention
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".