MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028343905 · doi:10.2960/j.v26.a5

Variability of the Stratification and Circulation on the Flemish Cap duringthe decades of the 1950s-1990s

2000· article· en· W2028343905 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Eugene Colbourne, K. D. Foote

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersGovernment of Canada
KeywordsOcean gyreClimatologyFlemishAdvectionAtmospheric circulationAnticycloneAnomaly (physics)Current (fluid)Ocean currentGeostrophic windOceanographyGeologyEnvironmental scienceGeographySubtropics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oceanographic observations on the Flemish Cap (around 47N, 45W) from the early-1990s to 1999 are compared to the long-term mean and to conditions during the past several decades. The mean temperature and salinity fields and their seasonal cycles were first computed and then used to construct T/S anomaly time series. The data shows a relatively warm time period from the 1950s through the 1960s and three colder-than-normal periods since the early-1970s. In general, it was found that variations in water properties on the Flemish Cap are highly correlated with those observed in the inshore branch of the Labrador Current at Station 27 and in other areas of the Newfoundland Continental Shelf. Studies have shown that these conditions are linked to the largescale atmospheric winter circulation, sea ice conditions, local atmospheric forcing and advection. An examination of local air-sea heat flux indicate that advection of Labrador Current water into the region may be the principle cause of oceanic variability over the Flemish Cap. An examination of recent acoustic Doppler current measurements and geostrophic current calculations indicated the predominance of an anticyclonic gyre circulation around the Flemish Cap during the summer and a significant and persistent Labrador Current component to the circulation. The results, however, exhibited a high degree of interannual variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery ScienceSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207