Population structure of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in an Australian canola field at flowering and stem-infection stages of the disease cycle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Populations of the ascomycete pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum sampled from a canola field were analysed using microsatellite markers. Fifty isolates were collected from ascospore-infested canola petals and, later in the season, another 55 isolates were obtained from stem lesions; these isolates were used to compare inoculum and disease-causing populations. Fifty-five unique haplotypes were identified, with gene diversity ranging from 0.40 to 0.71. Genotypic diversity was higher in the inoculum population than it had been in the previous year, but analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that less than 10% of the variation was attributable to differences between the 2 years. Genotypic disequilibrium measures were consistent with the occurrence of both clonal reproduction and out-crossing. There was no significant population subdivision between the ascospore and stem-lesion populations, as measured with fixation indices (R(ST) = 0.015, p = 0.90) and AMOVA, suggesting that there are no genetically defined subgroups of isolates more likely to proceed from petal colonization to cause stem infection. This might be because S. sclerotiorum possesses wide-ranging pathogenicity mechanisms that account for the lack of host specificity observed to date.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".